Apple faces yet another lawsuit over throttling iPhones

This time, an Italian consumer group seeks compensation for iPhone 6 and 7 users
Apple faces yet another lawsuit over throttling iPhones
Apple faces yet another lawsuit over throttling iPhones

A consumer advocacy group in Europe has filed the most recent lawsuit in opposition to Apple saying the corporate intentionally throttled older iPhones in Italy. First reported by TechCrunch, the potential class-action lawsuit seeks €60 million (roughly $73 million) in compensation — or about €60 per machine — for owners of iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S, and 6S Plus fashions offered in Italy between 2014 and 2020. Euroconsumers, an umbrella advocacy group within the EU that features Italy’s Altroconsumo, says the €60 compensation is the average amount consumers paid to replace their gadgets’ batteries.

When consumers buy Apple iPhones, they count on sustainable quality merchandise. Sadly, that isn’t what occurred with the iPhone 6 sequence” Els Bruggeman, head of coverage and enforcement at Euroconsumers, mentioned in a press release. “Not solely had been consumers defrauded, and did they should face frustration and financial hurt, from an environmental perspective it is usually completely irresponsible.”

Euroconsumers filed two comparable lawsuits in December on behalf of member orgs Check-Achats in Belgium and OCU in Spain. The group mentioned in a press launch that it plans a fourth lawsuit in Portugal.

Apple agreed to a $500 million settlement within the US final March, after it admitted slowing down older iPhones. It compensated consumers who purchased an iPhone 6 or 7, which had been throttled to protect battery life. The case grew out of the tech big’s “Batterygate” controversy, when iPhone consumers discovered in 2017 that iOS restricted processor speeds as iPhone batteries aged. Apple didn’t divulge to consumers that the feature — meant to deal with issues with telephones’ efficiency — existed. consumers mentioned if they’d identified concerning the slowdown feature they might have merely changed the battery somewhat than buying an all-new cellphone, as many did.

The corporate agreed to a second settlement in November — this time, with 34 US states —for a further $113 million. The state attorneys normal mentioned Apple “totally understood” that by concealing the intentional slowing down of older telephones, the corporate may revenue from individuals buying new telephones somewhat than changing the batteries. Apple didn’t admit to any of the allegations in that settlement.